Back to landing
Sources

Where our numbers come from

Every statistic on the Deslicer landing page is cited below with a public source. We only feature numbers we can defend. If you spot a stat on the site that isn't referenced here, please let us know — we'll either source it or remove it.

  1. Adoption91%

    of security teams already use generic generative AI in their cybersecurity operations.

    Publisher:
    Splunk LLC (in collaboration with Enterprise Strategy Group)
    Published:
    April 30, 2024
    Context:
    Survey of 1,650 security executives across nine countries (Australia, France, Germany, India, Japan, New Zealand, Singapore, UK, US) and 16 industries. Conducted December 2023 – January 2024. Verbatim from the press release: “93% of security leaders said public Gen AI was in use across their respective organizations, and 91% reported using Gen AI specifically for cybersecurity operations.”
  2. Understanding gap65%

    of security professionals admit they don’t fully understand the implications of the generative AI tools their teams already use.

    Publisher:
    Splunk LLC (in collaboration with Enterprise Strategy Group)
    Published:
    April 30, 2024
    Context:
    Same Splunk State of Security 2024 survey. Verbatim from the press release: “Despite high adoption, 34% of surveyed organizations say they do not have a Gen AI policy in place, and 65% of respondents admit to not fully understanding the implications of Gen AI.”
  3. Governance gap34%

    of organizations have no generative AI policy at all, despite their teams running it against production data.

    Publisher:
    Splunk LLC (in collaboration with Enterprise Strategy Group)
    Published:
    April 30, 2024
    Context:
    Same Splunk State of Security 2024 survey. Quoted from the press release’s headline subheading: “Global Research Shows 93% of Organizations Are Using Public Generative AI But 34% of Organizations Do Not Have a Generative AI Policy in Place.”